In a quartz clock, the quartz crystal is manufactured so that its oscillating frequency is close to some standard frequency but manufacturing tolerances cause every crystal to be slightly different, and things like temperature will change the frequency. This sort of accuracy is completely different from the accuracy of a quartz clock. Cesium-133 oscillates at 9,192,631,770 cycles per second. If you take any atom of cesium and ask it to resonate, it will resonate at exactly the same frequency as any other atom of cesium. The advantage of this approach is that atoms resonate at extremely consistent frequencies. According to Encyclopedia Britannica, the resonator is "regulated by the frequency of the microwave electromagnetic radiation emitted or absorbed by the quantum transition (energy change) of an atom or molecule." (See the National Institute of Standards and Technology for a diagram and description of the process.) The accuracy of the clock is determined by the accuracy of the resonator at the specified frequency.Īn atomic clock is a clock that uses the resonance frequencies of atoms as its resonator. A digital clock uses either the oscillations on the power line (60 cycles per second in the United States, 50 cycles per second in Europe) or the oscillations of a quartz crystal as the resonator, and counts using digital counters. The pendulum usually resonates at a frequency of one swing per second. A 2017 article from the outlet was titled "The Doomsday Clock just advanced, ‘thanks to Trump': It's now just 2 ½ minutes to ‘midnight,'" despite no one in the story being quoted as saying "thanks to Trump." Another story from the Associated Press titled "Scientists move Doomsday Clock 30 seconds to midnight" featured an image of Thomas Pickering, who is not a scientist and serves on the board of the Iranian lobbying group National Iranian American Council, at the announcement.In a pendulum clock, the resonator is a pendulum and the gears in the clock keep track of time by counting the resonations (the swingings back and forth) of the pendulum. Outlets such as the Washington Post have not questioned the group's movements of the clock. The last time the clock turned back was under former president Barack Obama in 2010, with the group celebrating his work on lowering carbon emissions. In a statement at the time, the group cited the end of the Iran nuclear deal, the "continued corruption of the information ecosphere on which democracy and public decision making depend," and Trump's decision to withdraw the United States from the Paris climate change agreement, among other things, as reasons that compelled the organization to believe humanity is closer to extinction than at any time in history.įor comparison, during the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when the United States and Soviet Union nearly engaged in a nuclear war, the Doomsday Clock stood at seven minutes to midnight. It has stayed there for the past three years. The clock's most recent change came in January 2020, one year before Biden was inaugurated-marking the official time at 100 seconds to midnight-the latest in the history of the clock. The original founders of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists included Albert Einstein and other scientists who worked on the Manhattan Project. The organization's director, Rachel Bronson, is not a scientist and previously taught at Northwestern University's business school as an adjunct professor. Both the New York Times and the Washington Post track every single one of its movements and place their coverage in the respective papers' science sections, despite the clock not having any relation to the scientific method whatsoever. In contrast, the clock moved three times toward midnight under former president Donald Trump, with the organization citing his failure to address, in addition to nuclear weapons, climate change and "fake news."Ĭreated in the aftermath of World War II, the "Doomsday Clock" remains a fixation by many journalists over its supposed prediction of when humanity will end. The decision not to change the clock comes after Russian president Vladimir Putin put his nuclear arsenal on "high alert," and NATO mobilized its response force for the first time since its inception. Subsequent questions about the organization's methodology went unanswered. #Nuclear time clock free#When asked by the Washington Free Beacon whether the clock would move forward after citing criteria the organization used in the past, such as armed conflict involving countries with nuclear weapons, a spokesman referred to a March 7 statement from the group saying the time would remain unchanged. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists will not move the time on the infamous "Doomsday Clock" closer to midnight despite a hot war in Europe involving a nuclear power, raising questions about the practices of an institution several legacy media outlets refer to as scientific.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |